The demoting of VW Dra

I am setting up a programme of variables to observe, and when I searched through AAVSO:s observation planner two weeks ago for semiregular variables bright enough for my binoculars (and the very light-polluted sky where I live), one of the stars that I decided to take on board was VW Dra, with a range of 6.0-7.0 V and a period of 170 days.

Tonight I made the first observation: I found it at 6.6. As I was doing some background reading on this star, I found that the International Variable Star Index (VSX) called the star CST, a constant star.

Strange. I still have the printouts from my search using the Observation Planner, and, yes, it says 6.0-7.0, type SRD: and a period of 170 days.

But that was two weeks ago. The other day, on November 11, Sebastian Otero of AAVSO’s VSX team changed the classification of VW Dra to constant, because no variations had been found in Hipparcos data or in the Geneva database of photometry.

Checking up some previous work on this star shows few, if any, signs of variation. 50 photoelectric observations during half a year in 1977 showed a constant magnitude.1 102 photoelectric measurements in another publication found no sure signs of variations.2 The GCVS, however, lists a photoelectric variation of 0.04 mag.

The variability of the star was discovered by the English amateur astronomer T.H. Astbury. He was a school headmaster, a member of the BAA and discovered several bright variables. The discovery note, published by Oxford astronomer H.H. Turner and dated 21 January 1911, is very brief and mentions no real data on the star3 Later, the star got the designation VW Draconis, and its variation was stated as 6.3-7.0 on the photographic magnitude scale.4

Then nothing much happened with the star. The AAVSO collected a couple of thousands of observations, finding nothing, and then came the photoelectrical era that effectively demoted VW Draconis from the status of being a variable star.

I think I will drop it from my binocular programme. I want more action from my stars than this.

  1. V. P. Murnikova and S. V. Vasilyeva, “Photoelectric Observations of Vw-Draconis in 1977,” Peremennye Zvezdy Prilozhenie 3 (1979): 589. []
  2. Gregory W. Henry et al., “Photometric Variability in a Sample of 187 G and K Giants,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 130 (September 2000): 201-225. []
  3. H.H. Turner, “Neuer Veränderlicher 1.1911 Draconis”, AN vol 187 (1911), 63-64. []
  4. “Benennung von neu entdeckten veränderlichen Sternen,” Astronomische Nachrichten 212 (January 1, 1921): 353. []
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

R Ari

One of the great visual surveys of the northen sky was done at Bonn by Friedrich Wilhelm Argelander with the aid of his asistants Eduard Schönfeld and Adalbert Krüger. They observed the sky north of -2 degrees declination during the 1850’s and the results were published as the Atlas des nördlichen gestirnten Himmels für den Anfang des Jahres 1855, commonly referred to as the Bonner Durchmusterung, in 1863. It quickly became a standard reference work for stellar astronomy. One of the things that made BD so useful was the precision and care with which the work was carried out. Argelander would not enter a star into the catalogue unless it had been observed twice. Also, inconsistencies were straightened out using larger instruments as a check.1

One effect of this continuous re-checking of results during the production of the BD was the discovery of new variable stars, one of which is visible in the November evening sky presently shining at magnitude 8.5 (at least when I observed it on November 5 using 15×70 binoculars): R Arietis. It was discovered by Argelander during the BD work; while Bessel had observed it in 1828 and 1832 as a star of magnitude 8 and 8.9, respectively, the Bonn observers found nothing in January, September, and October of 1855, despite a limiting magnitude of 9.1 (the Bonner Durchmusterung was observed with a 78 mm comet seeker – this must be one of the records in the history of astronomy if you’re looking for a high publication impact to instrument cost ratio). However, in November of 1857 it was visible right at the limit of 9.1, and the following months saw the star brighten to a maximum in January of 1858. It was announced to the world in a paper by Argelander dated February 14, together with his discoveries of S Aqr and an 8.9 m star with a proper motion of 2.”3.2

As we move forward through the decades, the avaliable data on R Ari is, at first, scarce, but increases towards the end of the 19th century. An 1890 review of published and unpublished observations of variable stars made since 1840 tabulated 198 observations of R Ari, almost all of them made in the 1880’s. This trend of an increase of variable star observing during the 1880’s is visible in the statistics of other variables as well. One reason is that Harvard observatory is moving in to this field of astronomy, another is an increase in amateur observation.

For R Arietis we find observations made by professional astronomers such as Argelander, the Harvard observers (EC Pickering, O.C. Wendell and Arthur Searle) using the meridian photometer and the 15 inch refractor, J.G. Hagen, then at the College of the Sacred Heart in Wisconsin, and Vojtech Safarik in Prague. Amateurs contributing observations of R Arietis in the 1880s include Henry Parkhurst, a prominent amateur who invented photometric equipment and whose observations were published by the Harvard observatory. He also formed collaborations with other amateur astronomers such as John Eadie and Arthur Perry, who with their smaller telescopes observed the brighter parts of the variables, leaving the fainter parts to Parkhurst and his 9 inch Fitz telescope.3 In 1884-1887, Parkhurst alone made 37 observations of R Arietis, compared to the 48 observations made at the Harvard College Observatory.

Other amateurs observing R Arietis in the 1880’s were Joseph Baxendell, father and son. Pickering, writing in 1890, knew of only a few observations by the Baxendells, but later on a batch of observations in manuscript surfaced that showed that Baxendell sr had placed R Arietis on his observing programme soon after it was discovered, in November 1858, and then made many observations of it right up until his death: his last observation of R Arietis was March 3 1887, at magnitude 8.5; he died half a year later, on October 7.4

Seth Chandler straddles the pro-am border, having made his observations of R Arietis in his own observatory in 1883-1884 using a 6 inch telescope, while he was employed by the Harvard observatory. Knowledge about R Arietis thus came about through a mixture of rather advanced amateurs such as Parkhurst and Baxendell collaborating with professional astronomers. By 1890, that knowledge included the period, given as 186.7 days, a range from 7.6 to 13.0 and a classification of it as what was then called “class II”, a Mira variable.5

That data is practically valid 120 years later; the AAVSO Variable Star Index gives 185.67 days and 7.1-14.3 V. It is a maser source.6

This Mira has shown some irregularities. A.A. Nijland at Utrecht had the star on his extensive programme of observation and observed the star with 3 and 10 inch telescopes. During the autumn of 1917, the star’s rise to maximum seemed to halt at about magnitude 9.4, where it lay more or less constant for two months; it was, Nijland noted, the lowest maximum for twelve years.7 According to one study, the extremes in maximum light are 7.6 and 9.4, so Nijland’s observations were of a more or less unique maximum.8 Material for further studies in the behaviour of the light curve of R Arietis is available: it is a quite well-observed Mira star, with 21 543 observations in the AAVSO archive.

  1. “How the BD was made”, Joseph Ashbrook, The Astronomical Scrapbook: Skywatchers, Pioneers, and Seekers in Astronomy, Cambridge University Press & Sky Publishing Corporation, 1984, chapter 80 (also in S&T, April 1980. []
  2. Friedrich Wilhelm August Argelander, “Aus einem Schreiben des Herrn Prof. Argelander, Directors der Bonner Sternwarte, an den Herausgeber,” Astronomische Nachrichten 48 (March 1, 1858): 13. []
  3. J. A. Parkhurst, “Henry M. Parkhurst,” Popular Astronomy 16 (April 1, 1908): 231-239. []
  4. H. H. Turner, “Baxendell’s observations of variable stars, edited by,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 73 (December 1, 1912): 124. More on the work of this very able amateur astronomer is in H. H. Turner, “U. Geminorum, Baxendell’s observations of, edited,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 67 (March 1, 1907): 316 and “Obituary: List of Fellows and Associates deceased Baxendell, Joseph,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 48 (February 1, 1888): 157. He is today sometimes remembered for his “unphotographable nebula”. []
  5. Edward Charles Pickering, “Index to observations of variable stars,” Annals of Harvard College Observatory 18 (1890): 215-257. []
  6. Priscilla J. Benson and Irene R. Little-Marenin, “Water Masers Associated with Circumstellar Shells,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 106 (Oktober 1996): 579. []
  7. Albert Antonie Nijland, “Beobachtungen von langperiodischen Variablen (1917),” Astronomische Nachrichten 206 (Maj 1918): 173. []
  8. J. E. Isles and D. R. B. Saw, “Mira stars – I: R Ari, R Aur, R Boo and S Boo,” Journal of the British Astronomical Association 97 (February 1, 1987): 106-116. []
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

V538 Cas

BD 60deg 201 is a star in Cassiopeia. Its variability was discovered by R. Weber. It was one of 75 new variables announced in 1958 after analysis of 2 068 photographic plates exposed between 1942 and 1958 using three cameras with apertures of 46, 71 and 83 mm. The star was found to vary between 9.0 and 9.6 photographic magnitude. Weber, who did not publish a light curve, suspected it could be an eclipsing variable of the Algol type.1

The next step was when Klaus Häussler used 135 sky patrol plates to study the star. Häussler was certain: the star “is coloured. Variations are irregular between 9m.44 and 10m.01 ph. The star is an Isb-typ variable”, he wrote in a 1974 paper.2 That the star had colour was confirmed by spectral class data: it had been classified as a K5 star.3 The next year, in 1975, the international clearinghouse for variable star data, Kukarkin’s group, officially designated BD 60deg 201 a variable; they called it V538 Cas.4

Case closed, one might think. A rapid semi-regular variable star with fairly large amplitude.

But now things get a bit more problematic. Variability on the order of 0.6 mag seemed to be ruled out once we got into the era of photoelectric photometry. A study by Henry et al found slight variations in the star but could not confirm variability of large or moderate amplitude in V538 Cas. Also, they found that the star is not a K5 star after all but an M0IIIb.5 Data from the Hipparcos mission seems to show some variability but on a very modest scale on the order of 0.03 mag; it is classified as a type U Hipparcos variable: “unsolved variable which does not fall in the other categories”.

Data from the leading variable star organisations is not of much help. Observations from the AFOEV archive or the AAVSO archive is not very clarifying; the star has not attracted many observers, and the data is not easily interpreted. It doesn’t show up in NSVS (I think), but that could be because it is too bright for that survey. The All Sky Automated Survey has not yet released and/or analysed data for Cassiopeia, and even when that data is released, there is a risk that we might not get any wiser regarding V538 Cas, since the star is close to the saturation limit (8 mag in V) of that survey.

What is V538 Cas?

Is it an example of the evolution of astronomical measurements? A variable that seemed to be fluctuating around 0.5 mag on small-scale sky patrol camera plates is suddenly reduced to variability around 0.01 mag once more precise photoelectric methods are used?

Or is it an example of something unknown lurking in the heart of Cassopeia, something that shows up only now and then, with significant activity but then keeps still for years on end? Remember, Weber thought it could be an Algol variable. The 200+ measurements made by Hipparcos and the Henry et al team could very well have missed something, for example an eclipse. Perhaps further clues could be found through reanalysis of the patrol camera plates used by Häussler; they are still available.

My guess is the first alternative. But who knows? Not many people observe V538 Cas these days; there’s a slight, slight chance that we might be missing something …

  1. R. Weber, “Catalogue d’étoiles variables nouvelles,” Journal des Observateurs 41 (January 1, 1958): 74. []
  2. K. Häussler, “Observations of 6 Csv-Stars on Sky Patrol Plates,” Information Bulletin on Variable Stars 887 (Maj 1974): 2. []
  3. Denise de Smet-de Potter and M. Neyts, “Étude spectrophotométrique et statistique d’une région obscure dans Cassiopée,” Annales d’Astrophysique 16 (January 1, 1953): 1. []
  4. B. V. Kukarkin, P. N. Kholopov, and N. P. Kukarkina, “61st Name-List of Variable Stars,” Information Bulletin on Variable Stars 1068 (November 1, 1975): 1. []
  5. Gregory W. Henry et al., “Photometric Variability in a Sample of 187 G and K Giants,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 130 (September 2000): 201-225. []
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

R Dra

I’m writing a series of posts on objects I observe or find interesting for other reasons. Let’s start it off with R Dra.

This Mira with a period of 246 days varies between 6.7 and 13.2 visually. Its variability was discovered by the Norwegian astronomer Hans Geelmuyden (1844-1920) in Christiania, present-day Oslo in 1876.1

The Astronomische Gesellschaft ran a large-scale collaborative project of observing stellar positions with high-precision meridian circles. The sky was divided up into zones and the Christiania (Oslo) observatory was responsible for the zone between +65 and +70 degrees declination. Geelmuyden and C. Fearnley observed the Christiania zone. In June 1875 and June 1876 they noticed a missing star in Draco. The star had previously been observed in 1842, when Argelander observed it at magnitude 8.9; Krüger and Schönfeld had also observed it in 1858, but now it was invisible. The new variable was designated R Dra.2

R Dra is easy to find, using gamma Ursae Minoris as a starting point. It is fairly well observed, with 43 000 observations currently in the AAVSO database.

The period of R Draconis changes somewhat over the years, as this diagram of calculated versus observed maxima shows.3

Like many Miras, R Draconis is a maser source, probably situated in the circumstellar envelope around the star. Its strength varies with approximately the same period as the visual light curve.4

R Draconis is currently near its maximum; yesterday, I observed it at 7.5 in 15×70 binoculars.

  1. J. E. Isles and D. R. B. Saw, “Mira stars – III: R Dra, R Gem, S Her, T Her, U HER and R Leo,” Journal of the British Astronomical Association 99 (August 1, 1989): 165-171. []
  2. A. Winnecke, “Schreiben des Herrn Prof. Winnecke an den Herausgeber”, AN vol 89 (1877), 212; C. Fearnley, “Über den Veränderlichen R Draconis”, AN vol 90 (1877), 15. []
  3. F. Kühnlenz, “Das Periodenverhalten des Mira-Sternes R Draconis.,” Zentralinstitut fuer Astrophysik Sternwarte Sonneberg Mitteilungen ueber Veraenderliche Sterne 12 (1990): 75. []
  4. Samantha J. Osmer, Priscilla J. Benson, and Irene R. Little-Marenin, “Water Maser Emission and the Visual Light Curve of R Draconis,” Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO) 20 (Oktober 1991): 203-207. []
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment